.
Feedback

Local Rabbi Weighs in on New Pope

What changes will his papacy bring? Weigh in here.

The selection of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio as Pope Francis I has come as a welcome surprise for many in the local Catholic community as well as some in the Jewish community.

Rabbi Carla Freedman of the Jewish Family Congregation in South Salem said like many, she was pleased to see the selection of a non-European pope, but wasn't sure the choice would bring about the changes that "so many North American Roman Catholics seem to be looking for."

"My understanding is that North American Catholics have moved well beyond the ultra-conservative positions on social issues that characterize the last two popes and all of the cardinals they appointed—including the former Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio—who were the electors this time around," she said.

"While it is encouraging to learn that the new pope has made the concerns of the poor a central issue of his ministry, it is highly unlikely, based on statements he has made to date, that he will move in a radical way to address such pressing issues as the shortage of priests, clerical celibacy, women as priests, and the array of issues pertaining to human sexuality," Freedman added.

Two local students of the Catholic-based Montfort Academy this week told Patch they thought Bergogolio was the right choice for a modern church. "Being a Catholic today is difficult...It's important to be strong," said Krishna Magalona in reaction to the choice.

Another resident this week said they thought his name choice signified concern for the poor. Rabbi Freedman agreed, with a note of caution.

"I have been impressed with the modest lifestyle that Pope Francis I has lived up till now, but I wonder how much of the pomp and circumstance and imperial trappings of the papacy he can avoid, now that he has assumed this august position," she said.

Freedman wondered how Pope Francis I would reconcile himself to the "gilded and potentially insulated life" his new role will force upon him.

There is much to be wished for in the rise of this man to such a position of influence, and only time will reveal whether we will be pleased by his use of it," she said.

Elizabeth Schreiber March 15, 2013 at 11:00 am
Why are you interviewing a Rabbi?? This is a very strange angle to take - she is not an authority on Catholicism nor speaks for Catholics.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) March 15, 2013 at 11:30 am
Hi Elizabeth, thanks for your comment. Religious leaders around the world are talking about the new pope, his influence on matters of the church and on Judeo-Christian relations. We didn't ask her to speak for Catholics and she offered her opinion on the choice. Patch—and media outlets in communities across the country—spoke to clergy of different faiths, or even different sects within one faith, about this news. What was your reaction to hearing the news about the new pope?
Ben March 15, 2013 at 12:35 pm
Furthermore -- Did the pomp of our current presidents' inauguration spectaculars - twice, BTW, as people are starving around the world, concern you? And did you suggest caution of the possible trappings of being president?? He and his family sure are living the high life at our expense.
This pope, from what i see in the past 2 days, is a good choice - he is humble, and caring, and connects with the people -- if he is not looking to bend the church positions for any social or political pressure, more power to him.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) March 15, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Thanks for your comment Ben. I am hoping for a more modern view from this pope—for example expanding the priesthood beyond only unmarried men. I've heard he entertained discussion on allowing women to become deacons—but as is mentioned here, it remains to be seen how great a change he will bring.
Lanning Taliaferro (Editor) March 15, 2013 at 01:48 pm
Hi, Elizabeth, if you'd like to see some of the reaction we chronicled from local Catholics you could read our interview with the visiting priest at St. Mary's in Katonah, that's here: http://patch.com/A-2Kjr You could also read our interviews with the heads of two religious orders based in Westchester here: http://patch.com/A-2HVX As Father Chris Monturo said here http://patch.com/A-2Krt, it's a big deal for Catholics and non-Catholics alike.
Ben March 15, 2013 at 02:02 pm
I agree with Elizibeth? And, I disagree with you, Lisa, in that the Rabbi is in fact - giving her opinion on how Catholics think of the choice. QUOTE: 'My understanding is that North American Catholics have moved well beyond the ultra-conservative positions on social issues.....' WRONG - i am a North American catholic and do not feel that any of the church policies are ultra conservative. Rabbi, please remember that we are talking religion here - not politics. And, a religion, especially Catholic or Jewish, does not need to bend for any political reasons. They have history, and tradtions, and have functioned for thousands of years just fine. The Catholic church has some cleaning up to do regarding scandals, agreed, but they do not have to make any changes in policy for social/political reasons. Furthermore, I take offense to your comments, 20 minutes after the new pope was chosen. You suggest caution in that he may be 'effected' by the pomp of the electoral process, and the 'trappings' of being the pope - are you being critical of Catholics and popes as a whole - over the years? It sure sounds that way. The churh - Jewish, Catholic, Buddhist, or Muslim does not need to change (unless it does people harm) for political/social reasons. Have you ever questioned Muslims and the treatment of women and Sharia law? Now that is a serious issue.
Ben March 15, 2013 at 02:20 pm
Lisa, your comments are clearly biased. Your last line is 'it remains to be seen how GREAT a change he will bring'. This suggests that the church needs great change. I do not think it does. The church needs more Catholics. It needs more people who believe in family values, and goodness, and faith, and generosity, and responsibility. It needs more people that feel that young children should not be having sex, and that a mother and father are needed to support a healthy family, and that killing an unborn baby is bad. Just becuase abortion, rampant drug use, gay marriage, violence, divorce and the rest is all over and supported by the TV/music and culture does not mean that the church should change. Just because some feel that same-sex marriage is ok, does not mean the church should change to meet that sentiment. Again, all opinions are welcome, but a religion does not need to change based on social climate and pressure. I hope that the church remains the same, and instead society changes. I hope society wakes up and turns it's back on the decadence, abortions on demand, cheating, greed, over-indulgences, and all that is hurting this great planet.
Joe Malichio March 15, 2013 at 03:49 pm
The fact that the MAIN SUBJECT of this story is a local rabbi is what makes it a non-story. Sorry.
Patch should interview Rabbi Stein of Curb Your Enthusiasm fame when our next pope is announced. Her views would be just as relevant as the ones conveyed here. No harm in weaving different religious leaders views into one article, but clearly this article was intended to communicate the apprehension Rabbi Freedman has with our new pope. This is what we call bias. Why don't you give Monsignor Thompson a call.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) March 15, 2013 at 05:58 pm
Thanks for your comments. This was in no way meant to convey the opinion of one local clergy person. In fact, before the pope selection was even announced, we had emails out to several local religious leaders of all faiths asking for their reaction to this momentous news that the world is talking about. Instead of writing one long piece—which is tough to read on the internet—we have broken up our stories into a few short posts, which Lanning had indicated above (@Joe, the first was an interview with Monsignor Thompson if you want to read that one). This is actually our third post on the new pope and we invite you or any other individual or religious leader to share their views in a constructive way. There’s no bias at play here—Patch is not only a news site, it is a platform to share information and have conversation. Thank you for joining!
Joe Malichio March 19, 2013 at 12:10 am
Lisa, thanks for welcoming comments and debate here. Sorry... I have one more. You said in your reply that "This was in no way meant to convey the opinion of one local clergy person." But, that's what this particular article was centered around: Rabbi Freedman. The Rabbi isn't so sure that the new pontiff will move in a radical way in addressing 'pressing' issues that face the church. And all I'm saying is that I'm not so sure that Catholics should be concerned with what the Rabbi thinks.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:14 am
I loved all the music - the band belting out 'Sweet Caroline' was great!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:12 am
Heather, thanks! I saw you in the crowd! These are awesome. It was a perfect night for it! I'll addRead More a link to your post from mine.
Josephine Ziegler presented the school board with the petition at the May 9 meeting.
John Craig June 3, 2013 at 11:50 am
Regarding paragraph 5 -- the retirement incentive. I haven't read anything to suggest that theRead More retirement incentive and the insurance switch are related or that that KLDTA asked for one to get the other. When I read the initial release from the board, I saw them as 2 different cost savings initiatives. ---The district indicated that each retirement saves a net of $32,500 per year. Early Retirement Incentive Plans (ERIPs) are fairly common stuff among downsizing private organizations. I think it makes sense to use them here to accelerate cost savings. ---The original petition was well written. Now that we have addressed point #3, I think it's time to make further progress on point #2 -- a financially sustainable contract. ---And, experience suggests that if you really want to move forward in a collaborative way, you have to let go of the past. Continuing to harp on past mistakes undermines point #5.
Sara Weale June 3, 2013 at 12:36 pm
Thanks for your comment. I agree that we all need to move forward -- but in my opinion, althoughRead More this side agreement made a long-overdue change in health care carriers (while maintaining a high level of health care benefits/access to teachers, retirees and their dependents), the KLDTA again asked for retirement incentives in return - just as they did for the December 2010 MOA that extended the terms of their contract for two years and avoided going to Triborough. Under the 2010 MOA, KLDTA requested a $10,000 retirement incentive and 21 teachers took the offer (including the current leader of KLDTA) -- resulting in an outlay of $210,000 by the district. Although some savings might have been realized for "early" retirements, it is difficult to calculate the exact amount because the district has no way of knowing when a teacher would have retired without the incentive. If 20 additional teachers take the new retirement incentive which was increased to $17,500 for some reason -- that is a total cost to the district of $350,000. Don't forget that regardless of the incentive, teachers retire with full pension and retiree health care benefits. Yes - the district will realize some savings from the incentives -- but we likely would have realized similar savings without incentives and natural attrition/retirement of our teaching staff. What I think we need to pay attention to as a community is that it seems the only way that KLDTA leadership will agree to changes in the status quo is if they get something in return. The last two agreements with the KLDTA will likely result in approximately $500,000 spent by the district in retirement incentives over a five year period -- money in my opinion, better kept in the district system during these difficult economic times and in the tax-cap environment. In my opinion, finally switching health care carriers did not merit financial rewards for teachers likely retiring in the next three years anyway.
Katonah19 June 6, 2013 at 08:08 am
For more insight, take a look at BOE Member Charles Day's statement on retirement incentives inRead More exchange for KLSDTA's agreement to changes in Health Care here: http://bedford.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/days-statement-on-kl-union-contract-changes