.
Feedback

Sun Protection For Your Pets

Just when you thought it was safe to go outside ...

Just when you had the whole sunscreen thing figured out, here comes Sarah to give you one more thing to think about. Maybe you've ditched the sunblocks that contain harmful chemicals in favor of less toxic formulas so you can protect everbody's skin without poisoning them in the process. You've bought the sun hats and SPF-rated beach cover-ups. But have you thought about your pets?

The AVMA (American Veterinary Medicine Association) just released a report stating that pets can suffer the same effects of overexposure to sun as humans: heat-stroke, sunburn and skin cancer. How can you protect your horses, cats and dogs?

Unfortunately it's not as easy as lathering them up as they finish their morning bowl of kibble. While the four-legged crowd may not wriggle and complain while you lube them up, they will—almost immediately—begin the process of licking it all off right after you finish. Aside from removing the protection, many sunscreens contain chemicals that are non-digestible and potentially toxic.

Happily, the FDA has approved a safe sunblock for dogs and horses—though it's not safe for cats. Cat lovers are left waiting in the wings while scientists work on a cat-safe sunscreen. Don't you love that image? I do.

Whether you choose to apply sunscreen or not, use common sense in the summer. Always provide shade and water, never leave your dog in a closed car—not even for five minutes—and keep them in during the heat of the day.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Aidan June 3, 2012 at 10:12 pm
What!?! No sunglasses?
richard June 3, 2012 at 11:47 pm
This is crazy talk! What do the animals in the wild do?
http://jokeofthedayblog.blogspot.com
ridiculous June 4, 2012 at 12:00 am
It's amazing with all that's going on in the world. Just get your dog a hat.
AH June 4, 2012 at 12:18 am
Animals have fur and this is a waste of the readers time!
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 12:24 am
You've not see doggles? ...http://www.baxterboo.com/search.cfm/doggles-goggles?gclid=CKLFyPCos7ACFUZN4Aod4we5Vg
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 12:26 am
Seriously...what will people think of next. BUT our white cat Gus loves to sit in the sun on the porch and we always note his bright pink ears...and wonder if they hurt him as much as it hurts us to see him so afflicted!
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 12:26 am
I'm sure I'd have no trouble finding that on line!!!
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 12:27 am
I report what I read...and this is the latest. Wait until FOX news get's a load of this. Fear factor strikes again!
AH June 4, 2012 at 12:30 am
FOX News is a million times better!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 4, 2012 at 01:19 am
Hi AH, and "ridiculous," you are of course free to read any news source you like. I for one appreciate the information. For me, I wonder how much will stay on? As soon as I spray the tick spray on my dog, he rolls all over the grass and seemingly rubs it all off! I can tell the heat definitely affects him - he's more lethargic and needs tons of water. We got him a hair cut close to a shave and my first thought was that bare doggie skin needs some sunscreen.
NAO June 4, 2012 at 01:38 am
I understand that many people who read this column do not have pets so they may think that this is ridiculous and that is their opinion. But to be nasty is just wrong. I have pets and I for one find this an interesting topic. Not every topic appeals to every person. I like many others did not think that dogs get skin cancer because of the fur/hair-but that is wrong. It is the most prevalent type of cancer found in dogs. This is because the fur/hair on a dog actually hides the tumors so many people do not see it or catch it early.
About 4 or 5 years ago AMC and NY Presbyterian Hospital did a joint trial of an experimental vaccine to treat melanoma. Both Dogs and Humans participated. The results from each species helped the other species. Here is a link that I found via the University of Pennsylvania's website and canine skin cancer: http://www.abc3340.com/story/7069038/canine-skin-cancer-overview Sarah thank you for this and many other informative articles on animals and their issues. Naomi
AH June 4, 2012 at 01:44 am
It is nice that Patch articles are free unlike LOHUD.
Really??? June 4, 2012 at 05:26 am
I have pets, two of them, however I also have common sense. This falls under the heading of informative, by showing how absolutely foolish people can be, whom evidently have far far too much time on their hands. Be sure and rub it all over their bodies, especially your longer haired breeds. And while you're at it, make sure they're not Glutten intolerant and safe from neighborhood bullies. File it under, EMBARRASSING.
Really??? June 4, 2012 at 05:30 am
YOU SHAVED YOUR DOG?? YOU DESERVE EVERYTHING YOU GET. LEAVE THE POOR ANIMAL ALONE. HERE'S AN IDEA, HOSE THE DOG DOWN, KEEP HIM INSIDE OR IN THE SHADE WITH PLENTY OF WATER. HIS COAT, AS THE COAT OF ALL WILDLIFE WILL PROTECT THEM. THEY DON'T NEED SUNSCREEN. ANOTHER SIGN AS TO THE END OF THE WORLD.
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 10:03 am
To the person who wrote in caps, dogs who grow hair, not fur, need to be shaved down from time to time as their hair grows like a humans and often tangles like a child's causing the animal much discomfort. In the wild they wouldn't last a year: knotted and matted the slightest cut would fester.
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 10:07 am
I agree that lathering a dog or horse up would be par ridiculous and wouldn't have even taken the time to read an article like this a year ago. I am fortunate enough to live deep in the woods where my dogs prefer shade to sun and have never heard of a dog getting sunburned. However when I read the AVMA's report on skin cancer and the affects of the sun, it did bring an interesting point to the front of my mind, and hence the article. Some dogs sleep on their backs...it is really on the exposed skin that is susceptible to burns, or short coated light colored dog (I think of a client's Shar Pei) that can be affected.
Sarah Hodgson June 4, 2012 at 10:08 am
Then of course there was our cat Gus who's ears grow bright pink in the summer from sun burn. Now I can assure you the day they come out with a cat safe sunscreen I'll be the first in line to buy it!
ItsOverHastings June 4, 2012 at 05:54 pm
" In the wild they wouldn't last a year: knotted and matted the slightest cut would fester." I guess those healthy coyotes all over the place are all under a year old. Congratulations on your ability to improve on nature and natural selection. Your ego and ignorance astounds.
ItsOverHastings June 4, 2012 at 05:56 pm
Please consult a vet before you spread your lunacy.
Sarah Hodgson June 5, 2012 at 01:09 am
You bring up an interesting point in a very interesting way. Coyotes have fur: labradoodles hair. It is as far from natural selection as you can get. Living on their own dogs wouldn't be out tethered or fenced in the sun, nor lounging at the pool or on the beach. But then again we're not talking "natural selection" we're talking about domestication.
ILoveLizzie June 5, 2012 at 01:15 am
If your dog is tethered in the sun, the ASPCA should remove your dog from your care. There are packs of wild labradoodles and they are doing fine without haircuts.
ILoveLizzie June 5, 2012 at 01:17 am
I also notice tha people with long HAIR don't live for more than a year.
Mary Beth Fairmount Avenue June 5, 2012 at 01:17 am
I gave my dog a haircut and my dogs doctor said that you shouldn't do that, not as much as i did. the sun is getting closer to the earth so i give my dog ice, not ice cream though I have ice cream cones with sun. if someone leave there dog tied up in the sun that's not a good idea. My mom said that when dogs makes babies too many times over and over with their same dog kind it makes them harder to take care of so maybe then shaving all their hair is good. I have shaved my hair but got in trouble when I did that too. I still like the sun even when it's hot and love my dog when I have one. Thank you thank you thank you thank you, very much. Mary Beth of Fairmount avenue.
ILoveLizzie June 5, 2012 at 01:24 am
As a self-taught self-proclaimed dog trainer from the age of 12, I have a little suggestion. GET AN EDUCATION. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, What do you think of "click training?" What do you think of electric fencing? How about using dogs to pull children on skis?
Sarah Hodgson June 5, 2012 at 10:54 am
Couldn't agree more, but some people who do love their dogs tether them outside--with an option for shade and sun, with water bowls and while I may not agree that it's the best option, they're not abuser who hate their dogs, there people who love their dogs and who feel that they like being outside. Right or wrong, people are convinced of it. There is not one way to own a dog, not a right and a wrong way to love them.... there are many many. Some dogs love sunning themselves, as do cats, and as the sun gets closer to the planet many are suffering the effects of heat as are we. This article is simply about sunblock for pets: when and if it's necessary. Should you cut a dogs coat....I'm not commenting on that either. Some dogs are so matted, little knots close to the skin, that it's painful when their owners pet them or their kids play hug them. Perhaps you can discuss the issue with a groomer.
Sarah Hodgson June 5, 2012 at 10:55 am
Where is there a pack of wild labradoodles? Now that would be a site!
Sarah Hodgson June 5, 2012 at 11:28 am
You're on a roll!!!
Sarah Hodgson June 6, 2012 at 02:24 am
I love your comments. Yes- it's true what you say...dogs talk through postures, not verbalization and you can hear them much better when they're not shouting...aka barking! I still love that dog spelled backwards as God...something I pointed out to my brother when I was 6 years old!
Sarah Hodgson June 6, 2012 at 02:28 am
Perhaps we should have a breeder or groomer weigh in here: while I adore dogs I have only had shedders..and heavy shedders at that! I do know it is better for the dog to be groomed regularly, and to avoid the buzz cuts at all cost. It's funny but a dog's coat protects them from the elements: cold, ice, sun and heat. When you shave them down it hampers their temperature regulation. But sometime a groomer has no choice if the dog is matted down to the skin. If your dog is ever shaved this close immediately check their elbows and nipples for nicks from the shaver...they can get seriously infected if left untreated.
Sarah Hodgson June 6, 2012 at 02:30 am
Dogs do say more in moments of quiet...and we can understand them so much more. Good for you to be so aware. Your dog is a lucky one!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:14 am
I loved all the music - the band belting out 'Sweet Caroline' was great!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:12 am
Heather, thanks! I saw you in the crowd! These are awesome. It was a perfect night for it! I'll addRead More a link to your post from mine.
Josephine Ziegler presented the school board with the petition at the May 9 meeting.
John Craig June 3, 2013 at 11:50 am
Regarding paragraph 5 -- the retirement incentive. I haven't read anything to suggest that theRead More retirement incentive and the insurance switch are related or that that KLDTA asked for one to get the other. When I read the initial release from the board, I saw them as 2 different cost savings initiatives. ---The district indicated that each retirement saves a net of $32,500 per year. Early Retirement Incentive Plans (ERIPs) are fairly common stuff among downsizing private organizations. I think it makes sense to use them here to accelerate cost savings. ---The original petition was well written. Now that we have addressed point #3, I think it's time to make further progress on point #2 -- a financially sustainable contract. ---And, experience suggests that if you really want to move forward in a collaborative way, you have to let go of the past. Continuing to harp on past mistakes undermines point #5.
Sara Weale June 3, 2013 at 12:36 pm
Thanks for your comment. I agree that we all need to move forward -- but in my opinion, althoughRead More this side agreement made a long-overdue change in health care carriers (while maintaining a high level of health care benefits/access to teachers, retirees and their dependents), the KLDTA again asked for retirement incentives in return - just as they did for the December 2010 MOA that extended the terms of their contract for two years and avoided going to Triborough. Under the 2010 MOA, KLDTA requested a $10,000 retirement incentive and 21 teachers took the offer (including the current leader of KLDTA) -- resulting in an outlay of $210,000 by the district. Although some savings might have been realized for "early" retirements, it is difficult to calculate the exact amount because the district has no way of knowing when a teacher would have retired without the incentive. If 20 additional teachers take the new retirement incentive which was increased to $17,500 for some reason -- that is a total cost to the district of $350,000. Don't forget that regardless of the incentive, teachers retire with full pension and retiree health care benefits. Yes - the district will realize some savings from the incentives -- but we likely would have realized similar savings without incentives and natural attrition/retirement of our teaching staff. What I think we need to pay attention to as a community is that it seems the only way that KLDTA leadership will agree to changes in the status quo is if they get something in return. The last two agreements with the KLDTA will likely result in approximately $500,000 spent by the district in retirement incentives over a five year period -- money in my opinion, better kept in the district system during these difficult economic times and in the tax-cap environment. In my opinion, finally switching health care carriers did not merit financial rewards for teachers likely retiring in the next three years anyway.
Katonah19 June 6, 2013 at 08:08 am
For more insight, take a look at BOE Member Charles Day's statement on retirement incentives inRead More exchange for KLSDTA's agreement to changes in Health Care here: http://bedford.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/days-statement-on-kl-union-contract-changes