.
Feedback

Anti-Fracking Vigil in Mt. Kisco Sends Message(s) to Governor Cuomo

A vigil of concerned citizens in Mt Kisco calls on Gov. Cuomo to ban fracking in New York, with brief portraits of some participants & links & resources

Close to a hundred well-behaved protestors rallied against fracking Wednesday evening at the Mt. Kisco, NY Village Hall.  In a solemn and peaceful hour repeated calls were made on Governor Andrew Cuomo to ban fracking in New York state.  The event was organized by Suzannah Glidden, Vitalah Simon and Susan Van Dolsen.

(For a behind the scenes look at how this piece came to be, stop by the blog at paulstark.name)

Hydraulic fracturing is a method of extracting natural gas (methane) from vast underground shale fields by injecting water laced with undisclosed blends of chemicals, many of them toxic, to break apart the shale.  Millions of gallons of water are diverted from other uses and rendered so contaminated that most municipal water treatments plants are unable to process it.  Water tables and aquifers are frequently contaminated, sometimes rendering homeowners’ tap water undrinkable, and sometimes flammable.  A slew of chemicals – including arsenic, lead, strontium, radon, uranium, methane, xylene and a large number of others, many unidentified – have rendered the drinking water for thousands of people dangerously toxic and carcinogenic.  In some cases bottled or even-trucked in water has been required; in some cases, homes have been rendered unfit for human habitation.

 

Early in the vigil, moving first person accounts of ruinous economic and health consequences were read to the solemn and determined group. Colorful signs from individuals and a number of organizations were held aloft in the circular walkway in front of the library and Village Hall.  Organizer Suzannah Glidden that the quickly organized rally represented a significant step forward in bringing together interfaith and citizens groups opposed to fracking. Representatives from many faiths were on hand.  Ms. Glidden was invited a number of Muslim groups but discovered that Ramadan celebrations interred with their attendance, though several expressed support.

 

The event was, as the press release promised, “a peaceful and solemn vigil.”  Prayers were offered, letters read, and there was a chance for anyone who wished to take the mic and make a statement.  Nearly all the current arguments against fracking were touched on.

 

For those unfamiliar with the issues, here’s a quick summary of some of the arguments against fracking: the dangers of contaminated and untreatable drinking water; noise and air pollution; millions of gallons of contaminated water stored in open-air ponds; increased earthquake activity; release of greenhouse gasses both in combustion and through leaks at the wells (methane is four times more potent in creating the greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide); well-documented health and environmental harms; noise and air pollution; dramatic declines in property values; fewer jobs, and a much lower quality, than advertised.

 

Fracking was referred to as “a crime against humanity, Mother Earth and all species.” No one spoke in support of fracking – standard arguments in support of the practice tend to center on increased economic growth, energy independence, and the comparative clean burning characteristics of methane in comparison to coal.  The vigil was attended by members of the local clergy, including Rev. Dr. Michael Tino of the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Northern Westchester, Rev. Gina Sharpe of Westchester Insight Meditation in Bedford Hills, and Sister Carol DeAngelo, SC. Participating groups and fracking resources are available [http://paulstark.name/journalism/anti-fracking-8-1-2012/]. Also in attendance was New York State Assemblyman Thomas Abinanti spoke about the proposed legislation he’s sponsoring (A08805) which would regulated fracking companies, demand disclosure of chemicals used, and hold extractors liable for damages. He told the gathering that “fracking doesn’t make sense – economically or environmentally.” Homemade posters put forward such messages as “Water is Sacred,” “There Is No Planet B,” and “Governor Cuomo, we will remember in 2014.”  A prayer from the Episcopalian Book of Common Prayer included the statement, “Lord, you made us fellow workers in your creation.” Rev. Tino enjoined the Governor to consider the consequences of his decision “unto the seventh generation,” a practice that might have saved the people of West Virginia the ill effects, many of them ongoing, caused by the coal mining initiated in that state “seven generations ago.”

 

Here are some quick impressions of some of the people in attendance.

 

George Klein, a member of the Sierra Club, asked why only the NYC and Syracuse watersheds were protected against fracking, while all the rest of the State was left unprotected: “Are all the other people less valuable?”

 

Scott Mori, a botanist, asked a simple question, why, of all industries, should fracking be exempt from the requirements of both the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. Later, he talked about his work at the New York Botanical Garden, his lifetime of research on plant propagation in rain forests, and said, “human-mediated changes are just screwing everything up.”

 

Tracy Basile, an activist in Wespac.org and a professor of Environmental Studies at Pace, offered free copies of her movie, “The Unfractured Future,” produced with Scott Halfmann through the Wespac website.  The documentary is also available on YouTube.

 

One speaker was heartened to see that “the crowds are getting bigger each time,” and praised people’s “stubbornness and willingness to stick in.”

 

After the formal vigil:

 

Bill Meyer, a Sierra Club statewide delegate, talked about helping to lead the Atlantic Chapter to take a stand against fracking and his efforts to promote an anti-fracking position from the national Sierra Club.

 

Vitalah Simon asked, “Who cares if we hate each other if we don’t have water.” She believes that publicizing stories of individual people suffering from the effects of fracking will be an effective tactic in helping to convince the Governor to decide in favor of a ban.

 

Suzzanah Glidden was pleased with the organizing efforts and happy with the event.  She was particularly happy to have helped to make new connections between interfaith religious and citizens’ groups, in spite of the challenges of organizing during what is, for many people, a time of summer vacations.

 

Dave Robinson came up from Brooklyn because “he wanted to see this.” He talked about his work with Food and Water Watch and handed out postcards for Artists Against Fracking and The Sky is Pink (PinkskyNY.com), an “emergency short film” from Josh Fox, director of Gasland.

 

Betta Broad from FrackAction was there with her big white dog and a fellow FrackAction activist manning a camera.  They were shooting video for “Voices Against Fracking,” a project which will compile footage of ordinary New Yorkers making personal statements on fracking and deliver the finished product to Governor Cuomo.

 

Jannette Barth, a Ph.D. economist, talked about her work with Catskill Citizens  for Safe Energy (catskillcitizens.org) and her efforts to bring attention to the real economic facts about fracking by lecturing, writing and testifying.

 

There’s no question that just about all the power in the confrontation over fracking lies with those who stand to profit from it and their advocates. Intelligent people of conviction and good will against the practice for all their reasons, even with Mark Ruffalo and Lady Gaga on their side, seem hopelessly overmatched.  But time will tell. Perhaps 120 people with signs and a microphone are part of the beginning of a citizen’s movement which will amass enough power to actually stop something as seemingly inevitable as fracking sometimes seems.

 

For a tasty selection of additional links and resourced, visit the page for this event at paulstark.name [http://paulstark.name/journalism/anti-fracking-8-1-2012/]

INTHEKNOW August 3, 2012 at 05:00 am
Wow.. no one spoke in favor of fracing? Well, it was an anti-fracing rally. What did you expect?
I would bet that every attendee had a cell phone, Ipod, or other electronic device that requires energy to charge. Of course, they think that energy comes magically out of the wall. As usual,. this article is full of half truths, lies and misinformation,. I suggest you look into the difference between natural gas and methane. Also, please provide documentation of ONE instance of water being contaminated by fracing.. not some anecdote, not some half truth from "gasland", but true documented proof from a enviornmental agency.
INTHEKNOW August 3, 2012 at 05:01 am
By the way, there are no plans to drill in the NYC watershed, because there is no shale in the NYC watershed.
Don Pachner August 3, 2012 at 01:04 pm
InTheKnow is obviously not In The Know. What we can do is bring you water from fracking-contaminated Pennsylvania wells that you and your family can use on the dinner table. You obviously have not researched this issue. Perhaps you would prefer that the waste fracking fluid be used as a deicer on your road, as is the practice of the frackers and their business partners. I'll be your home or your apt building have a green lawn that would turn brown and not be fit for growing any living plant.. You are confusing energy conservation with dangerous non-renewable energy production practices. Shouting in this forum will not make your vague personal accusations and vague assertions about the safety of fracking true. Hydrofracking as currently performed is an environmentally destructive and dangerous activity. I don't feel sorry for the frackers...they are throwing millions of dollars into lobbying to drown out voices like Paul Stark's.
Don Pachner August 3, 2012 at 01:08 pm
Please either research your asssertions or take a course Geology 101. Everyone involved, the gas producers and the anti-hydrofracking contingent would disagree with your misinformation on this point. Marcellus shales do exist within the NYC Watershed. They contain more radfioactive gas than in other shales considered for or in production for hydrofracking. Please think before you write!
Gristina Terziani August 3, 2012 at 07:15 pm
You are missing the forest for the trees: you are narrowly focusing on banning hydrofracking, which will ultimately lead to failure to push leaders to ban fracking, as usual. By focusing on the broader problem of population growth and on reducing family size, you will be 5 times more effective in banning hydrofracking, according to a study done by economists in London. BY encouraging more family planning and distribution of Endangered Species Condoms, you can reduce the population of NY at a fast enough rate to reduce and eliminate demand for more energy from hydrofracking. By forgetting about fracking, and focusing only on the broader, driving problem of population growth, you will have abetter success with more local, narrower issues. You could even stand a chance of eliminating demand for Indian Point and shutting it down. Condoms are so easy to use and so much more effective than supplying diapers, hydrofracking gas, nuclear power, houses from forests, etc for additional babies. Use a condom, get rid of the mini-vans.
INTHEKNOW August 3, 2012 at 07:30 pm
No, hydrofracing does not affect our drinking water... as the fracing occurs thousands of feet below the acquifiers. Please take the time to study the subject instead of just rehasing the old hippies information spoken at these rallies.
No one in PA has had a well contaminated by fracing... You don't have to believe me.. ask the Penn. Dept of Enviornmental conservation.
INTHEKNOW August 3, 2012 at 07:31 pm
And Don, no, the marcellus shale is not in the NYC catskill watershed. I will refer to you google, where you can easily pull up maps of both.
Gristina Terziani August 3, 2012 at 07:53 pm
Looks like "in the know" is a secret, paid fracking lobbyist, who is trying to create misperceptions about fracking to knock down Don Pachner, who is at least honest about being with Sierra. Doesn't really matter where the shale is, fracking introduces toxic chemicals to open up rock, releasing gases, and contaminating water. INTHE KNOW could promote birth control to keep the human population low enough so that fracking is not needed for energy. CONDOMS are great at preventing diaper pollution, followed by forest destruction, fracking, nuclear plants, cars, pollution, and all other enviro problems. Simply put, humans are the most physically pathetic species, totally dependant upon using their minds to destroy nature for survival, from cave man with fire and lean-to to modern man with nuclear power and mansions. There is no magical technological solution. I=PAT. Enviro impact equals population times affluence times technology. reduce the population and the other two impacts are reduced more than if you only reduce affluence and technological impacts. Too complex for intheknow to grasp, then look at google earth and you can see the vast enviro damage that humans have caused-and yet, most pepole are too narrow minded and too anthropocentric to acknowledge the problem of over-population. GROWTH BUSTERS and ENDANGERED SPECIES CONDOMS are needed on a world wide basis to prevent enviro damage.
Aidan August 3, 2012 at 11:16 pm
"Simply put, humans are the most physically pathetic species, totally dependant upon using their minds to destroy nature for survival, from cave man with fire and lean-to to modern man with nuclear power and mansions." Okay everyone, turn in your mind. It's baaaaad.
Well, I'm not joinin' in here. My loonometer tells me not to. And for dessert there's this: "GROWTH BUSTERS and ENDANGERED SPECIES CONDOMS are needed on a world wide basis to prevent enviro damage."
INTHEKNOW August 6, 2012 at 02:11 am
Sorry Gristina, your typical attempt to portray anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view is transparent. Why would you assume i am a "paid lobbyist". Im just a person who realizes that all the electronics we want to have, like cell phones, refrigerators, etc require energy. Ive also had 3 releatives have to serve overseas in a war for oil. *(*you know, the one obama was gonna stop)
Fracing (there is no K) is safe and taps into enough natural gas to end our dependence on foreign oil. It also means we dont have to do risky drilling in the ocean, like BP did. If you have a better solution, im all ears.
Don Pachner August 6, 2012 at 02:31 am
Look into energy conservation and renewable energy solutions, InTheKnow. That would save enough energy to completely eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. I am also hopeful that new technologies and renewable energy sources will evolve that we cannot even imagine today, but this would not respond to your question. Also, please look at information from independent sources in addition to government officials/agencies. They are both acting on the black box of politics that bears no resemblance to scientific reality, or heavily depending/connected to industry. That is the case in Pennsylvania, where the DEP is not known for seriously looking into allegations of pollution emanating from hydrofracturing operations (you seem to be fussy about the spelling, but not about your blind faith in all government officials to do what is best for the residents!) I have worked as a volunteer with grass roots environmental organizations in Westchester and Putnam Counties for over 20 years, and I have found that government is often under political pressure from industriy groups and unable to do what they believe is best for the residents like you. I expect some off the wall response from you, so I'll leave it at that and will not respond further.
Jimmy August 6, 2012 at 03:57 am
Drill a gas well bring a soldier home! You anti's are hypocrites. In your minds everyone should stop consuming energy but you. It is coming! It is too big. You are right "even with Mark Ruffalo and Lady Gaga on their side, seem hopelessly overmatched." Yeah!
Aidan August 6, 2012 at 11:50 am
The left is so far out of it, folks are laughing.
Don Pachner August 6, 2012 at 01:18 pm
I don't know who Mark Ruffalo or Lady Gaga are (other than they are an actor and a pop singer) and they are not scientists; but I do know undrinkable water when i come across it. Your argument sounds like a case of the pot calling the kettle black and, talk about hypocrticial, unscientific.
Don Pachner August 6, 2012 at 01:20 pm
Aidan, what do you mean by "the left"? Could you enlighten us?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:14 am
I loved all the music - the band belting out 'Sweet Caroline' was great!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:12 am
Heather, thanks! I saw you in the crowd! These are awesome. It was a perfect night for it! I'll addRead More a link to your post from mine.