.
Feedback

DWI Penalties: Are They Strict Enough? (Poll)

Heading into one of the busiest nights for DWI enforcement we ask you if New York's existing penalties are sufficient.

New Year's Eve is one of the busiest times of year for DWI enforcement, as police head out in full force to protect potentially drunk drivers from hurting themselves and other motorists on a night that typically involves drinking alcohol.

With that in mind, we want to know if you think the state's laws are strict enough.

New York law says driving under the influence will not be tolerated on the state's roadways. Those who violate that law may face a fine, time in jail and license suspension.

Penalties for DWI also increase with each conviction, according to the state Department of Motor Vehicles. The maximum penalites are as follows:

  • First conviction, misdemeanor -- One year license suspension if under 21; six-month suspension if over 21. Fines between $500 and $1,000. Up to one year in jail.  
  • Second conviction, within 10 years, Class E Felony -- License suspended for one year or until 21 years old, whichever is longer; one year suspension if over 21. Fines between $1,000 and $5,000. Up to four years in jail.
  • Third conviction, within 10 years, Class D Felony -- Same license revocation laws as above. Fines between $2,000 and $10,000. Up to seven years in jail. 
  • Any driver convicted of a DWI must install an Ignition Interlock Device (IID), a mechanism installed on the dashboard of a vehicle, for at least six months following the conviction. The operator must breathe into it before starting the vehicle and if the breath-alcohol content (BAC) is over a certain amount the car will not start, according to Ignition Interlock Device Org. The requirement of an IID is a new weapon in the state's DUI penalty arsenal.

New York's DWI Fatality Stats

The number of DWI-related fatalities in New York in 2010 placed the state 24th in the nation, according to Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) .

In the past five years alone there have been 1,845 fatalities related to drunk driving in New York; 364 of those occurred in 2010. MADD also reports that 30 percent of traffic deaths in 2010 were caused by DWIs. 

With these stats in mind, do you think the state's DWI penalties are strict enough? Log your answer in our poll and share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
This is a terrific addition to town! I know I struggle with mounting piles of things to donate andRead More finding places to give to. With the Community Center and now Goodwill, great to find a second home for goods.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 07:16 am
Thanks Stewart for posting this note! A good reminder for everyone about our shared roads.
Ahn Tou May 12, 2013 at 01:25 am
Okay but let's focus on the charter of the BOE. The Board of Education believes its primaryRead More responsibility should focus on creating an educational environment that will help our students become knowledgeable individuals, problem-solvers, quality producers, effective communicators, wholesome individuals, collaborative workers, ethical individuals, life-long learners, and responsible, accepting and involved citizens. We remain committed to providing a high quality, well-balanced educational program that supports our faculty and staff and helps our students meet and exceed State standards as well as high district goals. It says nothing about protecting the investments of taxpayers by voting "no" on every expenditure. We need forward thinking, broad minded individuals to help guide educational direction of our schools. Keeping expenses reasonable and and in check should be a consideration by the educational focus should be primary. Although novices, Trustees Tobin and Schiff have helped true the course of the board back to the direction of education. Mr Stone who himself admitted he had never even been to a BOE meeting before deciding to run offers no sense of motivation other than Dr Treyz and his friends think he'll help shift the direction back toward finance. Mr Holbrook is no different a candidate than Mr Lipton himself was 6 years ago.