.
Feedback

Letter: Move Car Wash Project Elsewhere

Dino DeFeo says county recommendations for new car wash site aren't enough to change the dangers presented by the proposal.

As you know, the Town of Bedford Planning Board, as well as the Town of Bedford Zoning Board of Appeals is considering a conditional approval of the proposed Splash Car Wash project bordering Valerio Court. 

A meeting at the Zoning Board of Appeals to determine a conditional approval has been scheduled on November 14th.  However, in the interim, a major new development has emerged that completely changes the situation: specifically, a letter from Edward Burroughs, Commissioner of the Westchester County Planning Board, to Alexandra J. Costello, Secretary, Town of Bedford Zoning Board, that clearly demonstrates the County understands our grave concerns.


I've attached a copy of that letter for your review, and welcome your sharing it with your readers, especially since it is raises critical issues that affect, not only the residents of Valerio Court, but everyone in the town as well.  Yes, my neighbors and I remain seriously concerned about the dangers of a high volume of cars entering and exiting over residential property, and the even greater dangers for our children who play in that cul de sac and walk to the school bus stop.  Add to that, the sure-to-plummet property values, environmental hazards of air and water pollution...and you can readily understand our concerns.

However, beyond that is the much larger issue about why such conditional approval is even being considered, when the Westchester County Planning Board has asked the project to be reconfigured to accommodate the adjacent residential community.  How do the Town of Bedford boards give such approval when the project does not square with the town's comprehensive plan which states that:

"Bedford will continue to encourage the balance between the commercial and residential areas, with the health of the residential areas being paramount.  In particular, the Planning and Zoning Boards of Appeals should continue being sensitive to the potential impacts on residences when they adjoin commercial development, as applications come before these boards for change of use, variances and site plan approval.  The commercial requirement of a tenant or commercial use are secondary to the town's long term interest in preserving single family residential uses contiguous to each of the commercial districts." Ch 6 page 54-55).  

Quite simply, if the Town of Bedford Planning and Zoning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals do not stand up for ALL the residents of Bedford Hills, we are ALL at risk.  Indeed, what happens when the next developer wants to build a commercial facility in a residential area?  In that sense, no neighborhood within a residential area is safe if this is approved. 

That said, common sense and the larger community interest should result in one simple solution:  MOVE THAT PROJECT ELSEWHERE.

Related stories:

New Car Wash OKd for Splash's Bedford Hills Site

Neighbors Protest Car Wash Plans

Letter to the Editor: New Car Wash Site Presents Dangers

ZBA Postpones Action on Car Wash Variances

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 10:16 pm
The phone number on this post doesn't seem right, can you confirm?
Linda Horner May 20, 2013 at 03:15 pm
I just finished searching The Farms and searched the park. This mprning, no sign but the neighborsRead More all know and r keeping a watch out for her
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Let us know when you find her!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
This is a terrific addition to town! I know I struggle with mounting piles of things to donate andRead More finding places to give to. With the Community Center and now Goodwill, great to find a second home for goods.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 07:16 am
Thanks Stewart for posting this note! A good reminder for everyone about our shared roads.
Ahn Tou May 12, 2013 at 01:25 am
Okay but let's focus on the charter of the BOE. The Board of Education believes its primaryRead More responsibility should focus on creating an educational environment that will help our students become knowledgeable individuals, problem-solvers, quality producers, effective communicators, wholesome individuals, collaborative workers, ethical individuals, life-long learners, and responsible, accepting and involved citizens. We remain committed to providing a high quality, well-balanced educational program that supports our faculty and staff and helps our students meet and exceed State standards as well as high district goals. It says nothing about protecting the investments of taxpayers by voting "no" on every expenditure. We need forward thinking, broad minded individuals to help guide educational direction of our schools. Keeping expenses reasonable and and in check should be a consideration by the educational focus should be primary. Although novices, Trustees Tobin and Schiff have helped true the course of the board back to the direction of education. Mr Stone who himself admitted he had never even been to a BOE meeting before deciding to run offers no sense of motivation other than Dr Treyz and his friends think he'll help shift the direction back toward finance. Mr Holbrook is no different a candidate than Mr Lipton himself was 6 years ago.