.
Feedback

Letter: Republican’s 2013 “Budget” is Wrong for Westchester

Westchester County Board of Legislators Majority Leader Peter Harckham writes about the the 2013 county budget.

Dear Editor:

While much attention has been focused on the political theater of the absurd surrounding the “passage” of the so called Republican 2013 “Budget” for Westchester County, relatively little light has on what a fiscally irresponsible and painful spending plan it is for the people of Westchester. Simply put, it borrows too much, cuts too deeply and funds too much patronage.

In short, this is a budget only the Tea Party could love.

The Republican plan borrows $48 Million for operating expenses: $37 Million for pension costs and $11 Million for tax certioraris. Every municipal financial analyst will tell you that borrowing for annual operating expenses is the path to financial disaster. This is on top of the $9 Million that the Astorino Administration will raid from fund balance this year to close their 2012 deficit.

These reckless moves may imperil the County’s AAA credit rating.

Additionally, the Republican plan fires over one hundred experienced County professionals who make Westchester safer and implement safety net services, yet it retains and funds over forty empty positions and funds fifty seven patronage jobs that do nothing to enhance the safety and well being of Westchester residents and businesses. Deep cuts are made to the Department of Probation, the Department of Emergency Services and the Department of Public Safety. Engineers who inspect the safety of our roads and bridges are slashed as well as Department of Social Services workers. Both of these sets of employees are funded through the capital budget or charged back to grants. There is relatively little savings to the operating budget for dismissing this critical staff.

The Republican plan makes steep cuts to services and not for profit agencies that save taxpayers money in the long run. County funding is eliminated (and so are the State matching dollars) for neighborhood health centers that focus on preventative care, keep people out of emergency rooms for primary care and provide a variety of state mandated county services. The parent share for low-income daycare slots is drastically increased and funds for Title XX daycare slashed.

These programs keep low-income families working and contributing to Westchester’s economy. As a result of these ill-advised cuts, caseloads will rise on more costly mandated services. Funds are also slashed for foreclosure and eviction prevention, services for the developmentally disabled, senior nutrition, soup kitchens, domestic violence prevention and many more critical services.

Conversely, the Democratic budget approved by Board of Legislators’ Budget & Appropriations Committee contained the same zero percent tax increase and the exact same spending level as the Republican budget. The Democrats plan, however, reduced borrowing and saved jobs and programs vital to the public safety, health and well being of Westchester residents by eliminating patronage and vacant budget lines.

With this more fiscally sound alternative budget available for approval, you can only wonder why nine legislators would force through such a regressive budget with three more weeks to go to pass a budget as mandated by the County Charter.

While the County Executive and some of my Board colleagues may be congratulating themselves and taking a victory lap for their Tea Party budget, the real losers are the residents and businesses of Westchester, who will pay more and face more risks in the long run.

Peter Harckham
Majority Leader
Westchester County Board of Legislators

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
This is a terrific addition to town! I know I struggle with mounting piles of things to donate andRead More finding places to give to. With the Community Center and now Goodwill, great to find a second home for goods.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 07:16 am
Thanks Stewart for posting this note! A good reminder for everyone about our shared roads.
Ahn Tou May 12, 2013 at 01:25 am
Okay but let's focus on the charter of the BOE. The Board of Education believes its primaryRead More responsibility should focus on creating an educational environment that will help our students become knowledgeable individuals, problem-solvers, quality producers, effective communicators, wholesome individuals, collaborative workers, ethical individuals, life-long learners, and responsible, accepting and involved citizens. We remain committed to providing a high quality, well-balanced educational program that supports our faculty and staff and helps our students meet and exceed State standards as well as high district goals. It says nothing about protecting the investments of taxpayers by voting "no" on every expenditure. We need forward thinking, broad minded individuals to help guide educational direction of our schools. Keeping expenses reasonable and and in check should be a consideration by the educational focus should be primary. Although novices, Trustees Tobin and Schiff have helped true the course of the board back to the direction of education. Mr Stone who himself admitted he had never even been to a BOE meeting before deciding to run offers no sense of motivation other than Dr Treyz and his friends think he'll help shift the direction back toward finance. Mr Holbrook is no different a candidate than Mr Lipton himself was 6 years ago.