.
Feedback

The Elections: A Primer on Major Races

Here are the basics on candidates running in major elections affecting the Hudson Valley.

Superstorm Sandy put our lives on hold, but not our elections.

On Tuesday, Nov. 6, weary Hudson Valley residents will make their way to voting sites and cast their ballots in four national elections that will directly impact not only the usual issues of education, the economy, and personal liberties, but also how we recover from the devastation of Superstorm Sandy.

With more than 145,000 customers still out of power in Westchester, Putnam and Rockland Counties, according to Sunday's estimates, utility companies have made voting sites a priority and promise that the storm won't affect your ability to participate in the democratic process. 

Now Patch offers you this guide to the basics in the following campaigns:

--

President: Obama (D) v. Romney (R)

Incumbent, Party: Barack Obama, Democrat
Occupation: President of the United States
Running Mate: Joe Biden 
Major Platforms:  "The New Economic Patriotism: A Plan for Jobs and Middle Class Security." With the slogan, "Forward!" Obama has asked for four more years to continue a long-term economic plan to invest in education, infrastructure, small businesses, clean energy, and tax cuts for companies that bring jobs back to the US. Lists 32 straight months of job growth under his belt and $3,600 in taxes given back to middle class families making $50,000 over the course of his first term. Seeks to develop all types of energies to protect the climate. Has plan to cut school tuition in half and double campus aid, rewarding institutions that keep tuition growth down. Added free preventive care and closed the "donut hole" in Medicare, lifted lifetime caps on coverage for 100 million Americans. Supports the right for women to choose and manage their personal health. Ended the war in Iraq. Supports comprehensive immigration reform and lifting the threat of deportation for young, hardworking immigrants who came to the US as children. 

Challenger, Party: Mitt Romney, Republican
Occupation: Businessman, former Governor
Running Mate: Ryan Paul
Major Platforms: "Mitt Romney's 5 Point Plan for a Stronger Middle Class: A Plan for More Jobs and More Take Home Pay." Romney wants to change the course of America by restoring the economic foundation. He seeks to create energy independence by increasing access to domestic resources, removing harmful regulations on the coal industry and approving the Keystone XL Pipeline. Wants to give students to tools to succeed by improving schools at every level and making them affordable, focusing on job skills and attracting the best and brightest. Establish trade practices that benefit the country, including curtailing unfair practices in China, building stronger economic ties with Latin America and creating a Reagan Economic Zone. Plans to cut the deficit by cutting non-security discretionary spending by 5%, capping federal spending at below 20% of the economy, consolidate agencies and give states responsibility for running programs. Champions small businesses by reducing taxes, stopping regulations that stymie business growth, protect businesses from labor unions, replace Obama's healthcare program. Does not support abortion rights.  

--

US Senate: Kirsten Gillibrand (D) v. Wendy Long (R)

Incumbent, Party: Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat
Occupation: Senator
Major Platforms: Promotes job growth through American manufacturing, believes in pay equity for men and women, marriage equality and women's reproductive rights. Secured $2.5 billion for New York schools to prevent layoffs and serves on the Agriculture Committee to ensure fresh, healthy foods are provided to all children. Supports strong gun laws and improved services for veterans.  

Challenger, Party: Wendy Long, Republican
Occupation: Attorney
Major Platforms: "Jobs, Freedom, Accountability." Challenging fellow Dartmouth alumnus Gillibrand with core Republican values including judicial restraint and limited self-government. 

--

US House of Representatives: Nita Lowey (D) v. Joe Carvin (R) v. Frank Morganthaler (WTP)

Incumbent, Party: Nita Lowey, Democrat
Occupation: Congresswoman
Major Platforms: A leading national proponent for strengthening our economy, balancing the federal budget, improving math and science education for children, providing quality, affordable health care, promoting biomedical research, safeguarding a women's right to choose, achieving independence from foreign oil, and protecting the environment. As the Ranking Member and former Chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign Operations, Lowey plays a vital leadership role in strengthening America's alliances around the world and ensuring that the United States meets the challenge of global leadership. In the aftermath of September 11th, Lowey was chosen to be a Member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security. She has fought successfully to provide First Responders with resources to confront emergencies, to obtain a fair share of federal homeland security funding for New York State, and to bolster security at critical facilities, including our airports, nuclear plants, and ports. Lowey has been called "courageous" by the New York Times and recognized by the New York Daily News as one of "New York's key Members of Congress." Newsday called her "terrific" and said "she delivers for New York." And Congressional Quarterly cited her as one of the 50 most effective Members of Congress.

Challenger, Party: Joe Carvin, Republican
Occupation: Fund manager focusing on farms. 
Major Platforms: The former Rye Town Supervisor seeks to eliminate wasteful layers of government. As supervisor, he cut town spending by 25% and cut taxes every year. He is running as the "underdog." 

Challenger: Frank Morganthaler, We the People
Occupation: Self-employed
Major Platforms:  "Less Government, More Freedom." Seeks to repeal Obamacare, defend the Constitution, repeal regulations that stymie business growth, repeal cuts to the military, support Israel, support life at conception, support traditional marriage, and enforce immigration laws. Plans to join the Congressional Tea Party Caucus if elected.   

--

US House of Representatives: Eliot Engel (D) v. Joseph McLaughlin (R) v. Joseph Diaferia (Green) 

Incumbent, Party: Eliot Engel, Democrat
Occupation: Congressman
Major Platforms: Member of Democratic Leadership Council and New Democrat Coalition. Supports abortion rights, international human rights, and a deeper relationship with Latin America. 

Challenger, Party: Joseph McLaughlin, Republican
Occupation: Businessman
Major Platforms: "A Citizen of New York for New York." Believes in the "4 R's: Reduce, Repeal, Reform, and Re-Establish." Reduce the size of government, repeal job-killing taxes and legislation, reform the tax code, education, foreign aid funding and fiscal policy, and re-establish Congressional accountability.

Challenger, Party: Joseph Diaferia, Green Party
Occupation: Professor
Major Platforms: Believes in clean and renewable energy, removal of all troops from the Middle East and Central Asia, repeal of the Patriot Act, and a ban on hydro-fracking. Supports a national healthcare program that allows all people to choose between traditional and alternative medicines. Wants to close Indian Point.  

Tyler Durden November 5, 2012 at 10:53 pm
Hey aren't there more people running for president than the two you choose to high-light.....oh.....I get it. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids.
Patrick Reilly November 6, 2012 at 12:18 am
When does the poll open at Rye Middle School?
Owen v November 6, 2012 at 01:19 am
These republicans are going to lose.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) November 6, 2012 at 02:57 am
Hi Patrick,
Polls Tuesday open at 6 a.m. and close at 9 p.m.
Wikiddi November 6, 2012 at 09:22 am
I am a Marxist and I would like to vote for Obama as many times as possible
Bushrod Washington November 6, 2012 at 12:46 pm
I urge all Americans to vote for my uncle, General Washington, for a third term as Chief Magistrate of the Republic. Even though he is ailing, he is willing to again leave his beloved Mount Vernon to serve his country. He is the only candidate who can lead our fledgling nation through these trying times. Mr. Adams is a brilliant man but he is short and of ill-temper. Mr. Jefferson, though cultivated and educated, is a French-loving anarchist and must be kept from the reins of power. Mr. Franklin is a corpulent bon vivant with loose morals. He is also dead. If you need assistance getting to the polls to vote for General Washington, our field hands can direct you to a nearby horse-drawn carriage that will provide shuttle service.
Sharon K. November 6, 2012 at 01:30 pm
Reporters have an obligation to report the facts without bias. These comments are clearly pro-democratic and anti-republican. So unfortunate that the people have such a limited source of unbiased information.
John Moschetti November 6, 2012 at 01:39 pm
Nita Lowey, has my vote even though I am a Republican at heart. I have called her office and she has been there everytime. Good Luck
Tyler Durden November 6, 2012 at 01:41 pm
Unbiased reporting? Has anyone filled Sharon in about the Easter Bunny or Santa?
Tyler Durden November 6, 2012 at 01:43 pm
I'm Nita Lowey and I approve this message.
Sharon K. November 6, 2012 at 02:01 pm
Isn't it sad that's it's actually a joke to expect unbiased reporting?!!!
sayitsnotsojack November 6, 2012 at 02:40 pm
If Obumma gets in again I will finally see what us anarchists have been waiting for, complete breakdown of government, can't wait for the riots to start. Yes it is true this so called reporting is very biased for the Democrats.
Williamgee November 6, 2012 at 03:46 pm
I would vote for Obama for a third term if it was allowed. He has class.
Williamgee November 6, 2012 at 03:48 pm
I would vote for Obama for a third term if was allowed. He has real class. Go vote.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:14 am
I loved all the music - the band belting out 'Sweet Caroline' was great!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 10:12 am
Heather, thanks! I saw you in the crowd! These are awesome. It was a perfect night for it! I'll addRead More a link to your post from mine.
Josephine Ziegler presented the school board with the petition at the May 9 meeting.
John Craig June 3, 2013 at 11:50 am
Regarding paragraph 5 -- the retirement incentive. I haven't read anything to suggest that theRead More retirement incentive and the insurance switch are related or that that KLDTA asked for one to get the other. When I read the initial release from the board, I saw them as 2 different cost savings initiatives. ---The district indicated that each retirement saves a net of $32,500 per year. Early Retirement Incentive Plans (ERIPs) are fairly common stuff among downsizing private organizations. I think it makes sense to use them here to accelerate cost savings. ---The original petition was well written. Now that we have addressed point #3, I think it's time to make further progress on point #2 -- a financially sustainable contract. ---And, experience suggests that if you really want to move forward in a collaborative way, you have to let go of the past. Continuing to harp on past mistakes undermines point #5.
Sara Weale June 3, 2013 at 12:36 pm
Thanks for your comment. I agree that we all need to move forward -- but in my opinion, althoughRead More this side agreement made a long-overdue change in health care carriers (while maintaining a high level of health care benefits/access to teachers, retirees and their dependents), the KLDTA again asked for retirement incentives in return - just as they did for the December 2010 MOA that extended the terms of their contract for two years and avoided going to Triborough. Under the 2010 MOA, KLDTA requested a $10,000 retirement incentive and 21 teachers took the offer (including the current leader of KLDTA) -- resulting in an outlay of $210,000 by the district. Although some savings might have been realized for "early" retirements, it is difficult to calculate the exact amount because the district has no way of knowing when a teacher would have retired without the incentive. If 20 additional teachers take the new retirement incentive which was increased to $17,500 for some reason -- that is a total cost to the district of $350,000. Don't forget that regardless of the incentive, teachers retire with full pension and retiree health care benefits. Yes - the district will realize some savings from the incentives -- but we likely would have realized similar savings without incentives and natural attrition/retirement of our teaching staff. What I think we need to pay attention to as a community is that it seems the only way that KLDTA leadership will agree to changes in the status quo is if they get something in return. The last two agreements with the KLDTA will likely result in approximately $500,000 spent by the district in retirement incentives over a five year period -- money in my opinion, better kept in the district system during these difficult economic times and in the tax-cap environment. In my opinion, finally switching health care carriers did not merit financial rewards for teachers likely retiring in the next three years anyway.
Katonah19 June 6, 2013 at 08:08 am
For more insight, take a look at BOE Member Charles Day's statement on retirement incentives inRead More exchange for KLSDTA's agreement to changes in Health Care here: http://bedford.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/days-statement-on-kl-union-contract-changes