.
Feedback

Bedford Budget, Under the Cap, Still a Work in Progress

A number of issues remain to be resolved before next year's spending plan and its tax increase below the state's new ceiling become a reality.

Bedford’s tentative budget and its under-the-cap tax increase remain subject to major change between now and the adoption of a final spending plan next month.

“There’s a lot in play, including the open-space [property-tax levy],” Supervisor Lee V.A. Roberts said Monday.

The $25,277,050 budget, unveiled to meet a statutory Oct. 30 deadline and officially termed “tentative,” must still be reviewed by the town board. The board, which is still in the midst of a , can revise the document and in any case must hold a public hearing on it by Dec. 10.

Thereafter, that financial plan—now the “preliminary” budget—would go into effect Jan. 1 if the town board has not acted on it by Dec. 20.

The tentative budget, posted with this story, shows a rise in the property-tax rate of 1.99 percent, a figure widely—and wrongly—thought to be subject to a 2 percent state cap.

Instead, the state’s recently enacted ceiling limits the property-tax levy to a 2 percent rise. In Bedford’s tentative budget, that levy goes up 0.99 percent, or slightly less than half the maximum allowed. Still, the —an opt-out permitted by the legislation—principally to guarantee it had flexibility in budget-making come crunch time in December.

“We have to meet and nail down a bunch of things,” Roberts said, “so this [tentative budget now online] is not the final offering.”

A 10-year-old program that acquires selected acreage in the town and preserves it as open space is one of the things in flux. Bedford asks its residents to help fund the program through a 3 percent surcharge on the general fund and highway budget.  This year, the tentative budget cut that contribution to a half-percent. But a public hearing last week found no support for intermediate reductions, with speakers calling either to eliminate the special levy or leave it untouched. A large number of town employees, drawn by talk of potential layoffs, swelled the numbers of last week’s town hall audience.

The budget proposes departmental reductions across the board but also includes such revenue-raisers as increased parking-meter fees ($50,000), hikes in building department fees ($45,750) and administration health contributions ($30,136).

With the reductions, however, also come some increases, including those in state mandates. “It’s so unfair,” Roberts said. “We get the cap but not the mandate relief.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bedford-Katonah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Frank May 22, 2013 at 04:27 pm
And the food at MTK Tavern is great as well!
Frank May 20, 2013 at 02:26 pm
SATURDAY Night!
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
This is a terrific addition to town! I know I struggle with mounting piles of things to donate andRead More finding places to give to. With the Community Center and now Goodwill, great to find a second home for goods.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 07:16 am
Thanks Stewart for posting this note! A good reminder for everyone about our shared roads.
Ahn Tou May 12, 2013 at 01:25 am
Okay but let's focus on the charter of the BOE. The Board of Education believes its primaryRead More responsibility should focus on creating an educational environment that will help our students become knowledgeable individuals, problem-solvers, quality producers, effective communicators, wholesome individuals, collaborative workers, ethical individuals, life-long learners, and responsible, accepting and involved citizens. We remain committed to providing a high quality, well-balanced educational program that supports our faculty and staff and helps our students meet and exceed State standards as well as high district goals. It says nothing about protecting the investments of taxpayers by voting "no" on every expenditure. We need forward thinking, broad minded individuals to help guide educational direction of our schools. Keeping expenses reasonable and and in check should be a consideration by the educational focus should be primary. Although novices, Trustees Tobin and Schiff have helped true the course of the board back to the direction of education. Mr Stone who himself admitted he had never even been to a BOE meeting before deciding to run offers no sense of motivation other than Dr Treyz and his friends think he'll help shift the direction back toward finance. Mr Holbrook is no different a candidate than Mr Lipton himself was 6 years ago.